Comments on: Indian Fighter Jets Violate Pakistani Air space

By: Ammar

Ammar — Sun, 19 Sep 2010 07:09:17 +0000

I appreciate your views, AR. And I encourage all sorts of comments and opinion to be aired at my blog.

However, Your comment is only from the Indian perspective only. Let me tell you, we have every proof to believe it is India that has caused us most of our economic and internal terror damage. What is India doing in Balochistan? What is India doing in NWFP sponsoring the Pakistani Taliban? Do you know Indian Currency and Indian weapons have been recovered during the operation in South Waziristan?

Apparently not. Only if our government was not a sell out and pro-Indian, nationalist Pakistani’s had every reason to hit back at India for all the damage they have caused us. Whatever is happening in India, particularly in Kashmir, is a result of your own wrong-doings and a result of false promises to the United Nations and the people of Kashmir.

Peace.

Pakistan, Paa’indabad.

By: AR

AR — Sat, 18 Sep 2010 17:15:54 +0000

how ironicle pakistani blog stating distort elements of indian incursion in pkistan and stuff… but what about the pakistani incursions state sponsored terrorism and doobious and rediculous fundamentalist views about islam? forget that how do u explain using indian adertisementts to keep fundamentalists like urself alive on the net… not just the world… in fact the indian muslims whom u constantly try to corrupt know who is the conspirator. ur alligationss like always r baseless as pakistani admin itself… try sticking to ur own business for a change guys and invest in education nation building andcaring for the poor in ur country or else it wont b long before pakistaan becomes a victaim of its own doing…. n forget that china ur elder brother would stand next to u in the r of crisis… theyl b the first ones to leave u… take this advice from an elser brother from across the border before it ges tooo late… coz india is patient but do not try to test its patience

By: Dhananjay

Dhananjay — Mon, 06 Apr 2009 08:11:04 +0000

Zaid Hamid?! Hahaha! Senilius, of all the things, you chose to link one of his articles. Its high-time people realised that it is idiots like Zaid Hamid who are the real threats to Islam / Pakistan.

By: ainee

ainee — Mon, 06 Apr 2009 06:43:52 +0000

if india’s claim on Kashmir rests solely on the accession announcement by mahraja then by the same definition, princely states of junagarh n hyderabad belong to Pakistan..
but they were occupied by India soon after the announcement of accession coz majority of the population was Hindu & their ruler (who made the announcement)was Muslim.. (at least Junagarh’s Muslim ruler did publicly announced the accession to Pakistan)….
so if the announcement by a ruler (belonging to minority religion) is worthless and the majority of the “awam/junta” counts, then wouldnt it be more appropriate to let Kashmir be a part of the Pakistani territory?…since the situation is exact replica of junagarh’s…(Muslim majority n non-muslim mahraja vs hindu majority n muslim ruler).

By: nikhil

nikhil — Sat, 04 Apr 2009 12:07:01 +0000

lol……..i cant belive it.

u are giving me the words of a pakistani and of crackpot zaid hamid as “sources”

By: Senilius

Senilius — Fri, 03 Apr 2009 14:22:57 +0000

Yeah, one Maharaja decided the fate of millions. According to the will of all Muslims of Kashmir, it should have been a part of Pakistan but Mr. Maharaja-of-Kashmir decided to sell their freedom.

An you guys really like to flatter yourself don’t you? India the best option for Kashmir? LOL!

The following article explains how good an option India is:

http://ahmedquraishi.com/article_detail.php?id=434

Read the whole thing. And don’t come back here because I won’t. Ain’t got more time for you. Fight on the link I’ve provided you all you want.

Adios!

By: nikhil

nikhil — Fri, 03 Apr 2009 12:10:11 +0000

Kashmir was given to india by its maharaja bcos u guys barged in during 47. if only u showed some patience lol…
so i think india has the rit 4 kash.

anyway kasmir does not want to be a part of pak (failure of operation gibraltar), and left on their own cud be disastrous. so india is the best option. India also started 2 get their gud will. so its cul. Anyway, heard wat ur chinese friends are doing to tibet? INcomparable

can u give me sources abt kashmir wanting’to go’

By: Senilius

Senilius — Fri, 03 Apr 2009 07:10:51 +0000

Now we are Wiki-haters too. ROFLMAO!

It’s funny how the article details about Pakistan sponsoring terrorism in Kashmir when they should be writing about how you don’t own Kashmir in the first place. Terming a ‘freedom struggle’ as ‘terrorism’ really ain’t gonna fool the world. Those who research it will know who the real crook is.

Even your own newspapers asked for Kashmir to be let go at the last protest held by Kashmiris, proving the point that Kashmir never was a part of India.

By: nikhil

nikhil — Fri, 03 Apr 2009 05:44:50 +0000

lol i know u pakis hate wiki bcos of the blunt truth it shows about indo-pak wars.

wikipedia gets its info from what it believes to be reliable websites.

if there is anything u want to confirm, just click on the respective link near the claim to verify the source.

By: Senilius

Senilius — Thu, 02 Apr 2009 13:12:29 +0000

LOL, of all the places you found a public editable Wikipedia?